Common > Comments and Formats 

As some of you know we had this fight going on today with comment "only warriors with 2 weapons" and some including myself have entered the fight not according to the proposed comment.

I talked to Valgas and Quad but its best to explain my point here imho.

First of all there are formats and there are comments, atm we have two formats and lets say ten thousand comments.

The one entering "only wood" or "no mages" fight wearing offensive outfit is known as a jackal and his ass is kicked.

The one breaking non-format fight with whatsoever comment is showing his disrespect to the player that created a fight and/or to comment. Respect is cool, disrespect is bad but still such fights and the players involved have nothing to do with jackals.

I entered that fight just to display my attitude to such comments. You are free to invent any kind of comment and fight bravely to protect it and make people obey it and become a legend but

its very unlikely that a comment like "only lvl 6 without hats but with rings at least one of which must be losers ring" will ever become a format.

Thats an exaggeration of course. But the whole thing is about fair play. When a player creates a format he primarily wants it to safeguard him from uncomfortable opponents. "without levels seven or die"

But the one that gets deprived from fighting says "crap i'm discriminated".

Some would say that wood format discriminates sword of truth and "no mages" does the same with robots, and i would say "you right".

But such comments have just luckily happened to become formats because they are less offensive than others. more general maybe.

thats it.

Agree with you 100% :) Its a bad habit that everybody tries to make a format where he can be sure hes the strongest.
No potions,2 weapons,only the parts I wear,no maneuvers...
I think if we are all playing the same game only 2 formats should stay protected,as Binaco said before,and the rest are wishes.
Now don`t act like chicken and fight with the best full you have ;)

no comments and no format thats the best for all

When the player creates fight with comment that is means, that he wishes to fight on such format and you will state disrespect for the person, having joined in this fight not on a format. This right of the player to fight how he wants... If you don't like such format of fight, it is simple -  DO NOT JOIN. Probably, some ppl will be interestin that fight fith this comment(format) ...

P.S. i know, that my english is very bad :red:

when U are making battles U write "Warriors only" and U say its format.... but our words "warriors only with 2 weapons" U ignore and say it is comment.... like Penny said thats wishes...

where is the difference?

at the beginning who said that words"Warriors only" or "no mages" is a format... who decide it...  warriors with 1 weapon or warrior with 2 weapons is a big difference, right... so why words "warriors only with 2 weapons" can't be a format? U decide it or who....

I don't agree with your opinion...

I agree with Vampyres - better no comments at all or second variant is that all people notice the comments... so - if its writen 2 weapons, than its 2 weapons and no shield or staff. its not fair to warriors with 2 weapons - I think its new race[warriors with 2 weapons] like mages or warriors.

i think, all who want fight with 50/50 chance understood this format "Wariors with TWO weapons"

Quad_damage
Agree...and who wants free exp will join not with such format....

agree with bububoss ... such formats as wood was invited before 2nd hand weapon after all ... so when we have 2 weapons now, there could be one more format ... maybe we with 2 weapons R a bit tired from always the same old boring chaots full of OB stuffers and we wanna our own partys ??? ... tell me, how we can do this without such comment ???

sub
i agree on all points

bububoss
i dunno who said those are formats, not me definitely. lets say at some point people of the city thought that would be good.

"warriors only" and "warriors only with two weapons" - not very different
"warriors only with two weapons" - "warriors only with two weapons but without ecr" - not very different
...
...
"warriors only" and "only lvl 6 without hats but with rings at least one of which must be losers ring" - see the difference?

feLIne

if you want same become a format officially thats not that hard, actually it'd take 2 hours of effort

why do you have to make it so complicated??? its simple just join the fight with a second weapon, everyone is happy and life goes on.....!!!

in this topic i see an Order of Balance guy, a Killua and a dark.. make it your policy to protect such comment and kill anyone thats non-compliant, inform people..

then ask the Order what do Paladins think, i wont be against that format thats for sure

point dexter jr

just looking in the future..
i got a lot of respect to those that deserve it dont worry about that =)

=]] ... and about ... "lets say at some point people of the city thought that would be good." ... I think this is the time, when some ppl do think that this  would be good as format ... =]]]

I agree with feLIne... just accept those words as new format and all will be happy =]

why don`t you call it "without golden or obliv" ?

:laugh: