Common > Inquisitors challenge 2006 

to The Firestarter and Miraculis

so according to your proposal we should stop this contest after the first 3 tasks?
in your eyes the best fighter would be the one who can win it, right?
or don`t you agree that fighting in full vs an enemy of the same strength might be also a bit importand to judge this?
This contest was not about who can slash most newbies, the first rounds were not to show up who has most time in fc, sorry if it looked like that!It was to find one fighter who is able to manage all given tasks a worrior could face.
This first rounds were usefull to show up the facts given in any task.Nothing more, nothing less.

> Penny [8]   (11.09.06 20:43)

I still think it wasn't 100% fair... so ok, bouth full is alright, but one gets lucky and it says he's the best warrior in NC ? I think they need something like 10 matches to really know who is the best but 3 would of been enough to give a fair chance to the better one of bouth ;)

to Hebrew Hammer

Ok,10 fights and one has a bad day,than we make 10 the next day again?Or maybe 15 fights?Or 100?
why not 1 and the winner wins it ? :/

don`t get the point in this discussion.

Tactic shows the best warrior... Sherock earned more points bcz of his tactic skills n he need 2 have advantage. Same if kid had more points. If lvl 6 with 1000 points would fight in final with sherlock 4xampl with 20 points sherlock would win bcz u told that finall fight is made in full. 6 lvl would die in 1 crit.

> Penny [8]  

I said 3 and I said I think that 10 wil show the real winner but 3 is enough to give a fair chance for bouth... and I think Sherlock should of won... but its over now... so nothing to do ;)

I'm in too ))

What about: Inquisitors challenge 2007?

Ppl, bring back Penny :mol:

P.S. WoW is shit =)

lol :DDD i was 3 place